{"id":651,"date":"2013-05-08T08:52:33","date_gmt":"2013-05-08T07:52:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.iese.edu\/economics\/?p=651"},"modified":"2015-03-17T11:59:48","modified_gmt":"2015-03-17T10:59:48","slug":"the-bitcoin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.iese.edu\/economics\/2013\/05\/08\/the-bitcoin\/","title":{"rendered":"The Bitcoin"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Bitcoin\"<\/a>
The bitcoin<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The bitcoin<\/strong> is the new fashion. The Economist<\/i> explains how it works here<\/a>,\u00a0discusses its future here<\/a>,\u00a0Paul Krugman<\/strong> talks about it in his blog for the New York Times<\/i> here<\/a>,\u00a0and El Pa\u00eds<\/i> has translated his comments here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

To evaluate a currency or a candidate for currency, the first thing you have to do is ask if it is actually money or not<\/strong>. That is, if it is used frequently in transactions. For this to happen, the more people who accept it as a means of payment because they trust that others are going to accept it, the better<\/strong> \u2013 the first appearance of the Nash Equilibrium in this blog.<\/p>\n

From a global point of view, the U.S. dollar is a better currency than the euro in this sense and the euro is much better than the zoquito<\/i> \u2013 a social currency used by a few hundred consumers of ecological products in Jerez de la Frontera, in the south of Spain.<\/p>\n

Yet it is true that, from a more local point of view in the eurozone, the euro is clearly a better means of payment than the U.S. dollar and it is possible that that someday the zoquito<\/i> will dominate the euro in the ecological marketplace of Jerez.<\/p>\n

First, a bit of theory ;-). The history of money is the history of technological innovation that has the ultimate goal of improving three functions of money: account unit, means of payment and deposit value<\/strong>. The function of the means of payment of the currency improves when transaction costs decrease. And the contribution of credit cards is not so clear because when losing anonymity and requiring a third party \u2013 the banking entity that issues the card or Visa \u2013 to guarantee payment, transaction costs become greater than those of paper currency.<\/p>\n

The function of the deposit value of money improves when the value of the money becomes more stable. That is, when money is exchanged for goods at a stable price, without inflation or deflation, and when ownership costs go down and money becomes more secure<\/i>.\u00a0 In terms of the original ownership, credit cards don\u2019t improve anything because they do not define the account unit \u2013 even though it\u2019s true that there are some exceptions to this general rule. Recall, for instance, in the mid-1980s when at some gas stations in Minneapolis the price of gas varied if you paid in cash or with a credit card. This price difference redefined the account unit. And, in respect to money security, one could argue that since they are nominative, credit cards represent an improvement over paper money.<\/p>\n

\"Bitcoin<\/a>
The bitcoin exchange rate. Source: The Economist<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

And now about the bitcoin. Is it a good currency?<\/strong> Right now, it is probably better than zoquitos<\/em>, but it is certainly a worse currency than U.S. dollars, euros, sterling pounds or slotys. And in the future? At the moment, Graphic 1, which I have taken from the second article in The Economist<\/i>, shows that prices in bitcoins are not very stable.<\/p>\n

What advantages does the bitcoin have?<\/strong> Supposedly, its transaction costs are less than those of any other means of payment. This assertion, however, should be qualified because networked computers take about 10 minutes to confirm the validity of transactions. For some, another advantage is that the bitcoin is a means of payment among equals (peer-to-peer<\/i>), which means that government intervention is unnecessary<\/strong>.What drawbacks does this have?<\/strong> Like gold, it is costly to produce. Even though to acquire bitcoins, instead of excavating, you have to resolve mathematical problems. And that its availability is supposedly limited, which makes permanent deflation inevitable when approaching the limit.\u00a0 Of course, this problem has the hidden advantage that central banks cannot raise taxes imposed every time emission increases.<\/p>\n

What\u2019s going to happen? In a globalized economy, real and virtual money compete and will continue competing against each other. The physical form is what matters least \u2013 it\u2019s easy to demonstrate that, in addition to being necessary, trust in a currency is enough to give it value. And it is likely that we will use currencies in diverse forms in the not-so-distant future.<\/p>\n

I, for example, keep waiting for the day that we have a means of payment that makes it feasible for readers to pay me one euro cent for this blog post \u2013 but only those of you who liked it, of course.<\/p>\n

Challenge for engineers<\/strong>:\u00a0<\/i>read the article signed by the mysterious Sataoshi Nakamoto, \u201cBitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system<\/a>,\u201d\u00a0and explain to us economists and others exactly how the bitcoin functions. I\u2019ll invite you to have a beer if I like the explanation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The bitcoin is the new fashion. The Economist explains how it works here,\u00a0discusses its future here,\u00a0Paul Krugman talks about it in his blog for the New York Times here,\u00a0and El Pa\u00eds has translated his comments here. To evaluate a currency or a candidate for currency, the first thing you have to do is ask if […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":883,"featured_media":732,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[71736],"tags":[71741],"class_list":["post-651","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-others","tag-bitcoin","megacategoria-mc-economics"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.iese.edu\/economics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/651","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.iese.edu\/economics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.iese.edu\/economics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.iese.edu\/economics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/883"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.iese.edu\/economics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=651"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/blog.iese.edu\/economics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/651\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":733,"href":"https:\/\/blog.iese.edu\/economics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/651\/revisions\/733"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.iese.edu\/economics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/732"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.iese.edu\/economics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=651"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.iese.edu\/economics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=651"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.iese.edu\/economics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=651"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}