Assignments FROM Developing Locations: Latest Survey Results

fishLately a lot is being said and written about the growing trend of sending international assignees to developing and emerging countries. In fact, emerging markets have remained a hot topic in the current year, and mobility specialists and relocation managers continue to point to the many challenges in developing destinations: Security issues, appropriateness of compensation packages, and less attractive living conditions are just a few examples.

However, given the business expansion and foreign investments into developing countries, assignees from developing locations are also on the rise. Such assignment types have been less common and hence are less known. Yet, the area demands more attention. A recent survey by Brookfield Global Relocation Services (BGRS) indicates that assignments from developing locations differ from other assignments, and brings up a host of new facets of challenges and concerns.

Following are the main findings from the relevant BGRS survey (2013).

 

Where do they come from and where do they go?

Although derived from quite a modest sample size in the survey, the main origin and destination locations of this assignment type are not surprising. Specifically, the main sources of assignees were developing economies such as India, Latin America and China, while the US headed the list of destinations with 70% of respondents citing it.


Why to recruit assignees from developing locations?

The majority of assignments from developing locations are educational and developing in nature, as managers of newly established companies want to send their local employees to be trained in other locations. Therefore, the main purpose is to develop talent from emerging locations. In case an assignee is transferred from the company’s subsidiary in a developing location to its headquarters in another place, such an assignee is termed inpatriate. According to my research, inpatriates have an important role of so-called linking pins between HQ and subsidiaries, and are meant to facilitate knowledge flows between these units. As such, inpatriates go to subsidiaries not only to gain knowledge, but should be valued also for sharing knowledge about their local market, which can help the company in improving business strategies and practices in expanding into new emerging locations. 

The other two cited reasons for hiring assignees from developing and emerging countries concern serving the interests of the host location, as assignees are recruited either to fill a skill gap in the host location, or due to their lower labor costs compared to host location nationals.

 

What are the common challenges and solutions for assignments from developing locations?

  • Compensation

According to Brookfield survey interviewees, the primary characteristic of a developing location is its lower wage level compared to the assignment destination. Hence, 85% of respondents perceived the main challenge to revolve around issues of appropriate compensation levels and their delivery.

In relation to compensation, survey respondents suggested using the home country balance sheet approach, which would allow maintaining the expatriate’s standard of living at the same level as it was in his/her home country throughout the assignment. Such maintenance of home country lifestyle is justified in case the assignment from a developing country is temporary, and repatriation to the home country after the assignment is planned. On the contrary, if the assignment is longer term and there is no intention of repatriation, it is better to level the salary with host peer salary. However, this alternative loses out on the possible benefits of hiring an employee from a lower wage location. More on the differences and challenges of different compensation packages can be read in an earlier blog entry of mine.

The third option is to combine the home country and host country approaches by using the balance sheet approach as a base salary package, while equalizing supplemental allowances with host location levels.

Another notion brought up in the survey is that contrary to the general expectation of low assignment costs, the actual spending on assignees from developing countries can be surprisingly high. As reported, business managers often do not consider relocation costs beyond salaries, as well as possible costs related to immigration difficulties.

 

  • Family challenges

The family challenges common for such assignments are foremost related to the cultural peculiarities, as well as economic and governmental conditions of developing countries. Some of the drastic examples include employees that cannot relocate with a child because of foregoing  placements in a school, having more than one wife in some cultures, as well as having large families, which are still more common for developing countries. Moreover, in poorer countries, taking the breadwinner away from the family may simply worsen the family economic situation.

To address the manageable issues with regard to assignee families, global mobility professionals look into flexible assignment policies, which allow for extra support benefits, such as provisions for families, return visits for the assignee, and allowances for international calls.

 

  • Cultural barriers

Cultural challenges are closely related to the compensation and family concerns reviewed above. First of all, the differences in standards of living can trigger conflicts. As commented by survey respondents, executives from developing countries may be used to having a certain status and receiving many more privileges with their salaries back home compared to the host location. This can be explained by a bigger gap in salary levels between different positions and social classes in developing countries. As such, the compensation of some employees from developing countries can be actually higher than it is for their peers in developed countries. For example, an assignee from a developing country may be used to employing a personal driver, maids and nannies back at home, which may turn out to be very challenging in a developed country, even with an expatriate compensation package.

Moreover, general cultural norms in developing locations can be quite different. Clearly,  when comparing an assignee from the UK going to the US with an assignee from India going to the US, the levels of required cultural adaptability and cross-cultural training would vary substantially. Plainly speaking, solutions for addressing these cultural barriers rest in good assignee selection and preparation. Potential assignees should be flexible and open-minded to adapt to the host-country environment, and their preparation should aim to place realistic expectations on the relocation, and explore the possible challenges and respective coping strategies to be used abroad.

 

Apart from the reviewed issues, BGRS survey respondents also indicated the challenges of host country language, immigration laws, talent management, and repatriation. These will be reviewed in my next blog post though.

21 thoughts on “Assignments FROM Developing Locations: Latest Survey Results

  1. Business expansion developed countries to developing countries is certainly very good in helping the economic growth of developing countries, but sometimes governments of the developing countries pay less attention to the rights of citizens around the location of the foreign company.

  2. thank you dearly author , I found oneself this web site very helpful and its full of excellent healthy selective information ! , I as well thank you for the fantastic food plan post.

  3. You could certainly see your skills within the work you write. The sector hopes for even more passionate writers like you who are not afraid to mention how they believe. All the time go after your heart. “He never is alone that is accompanied with noble thoughts.” by Fletcher.

  4. Hi, for everyone.
    My name is Vika and I am a student of Khabarovsk State Academy of Economics and Law. I asked myself which cultural similarities and differences there are between the countries. I used literature to try to find an answer to this question, but I mainly used Hofstedes Cultural Dimensions to compare and study skelbimai how the countries related to the four dimensions, Power distance, Individualism, Masculinity and Uncertainty avoidance.
    I did an interview with J. Kildisiene who is a jurist at Karbauskas. He is in daily contact with executives from Switzerland and has been collaborating with them for many years. I was interested in how the national cultures influence on a negotiation between the countries. Does Jacob find it different and more complicated to negotiate with LT people and if so, what are the differences and resemblances? What is his opinion about the extremely diverted sight on women’s roles in the society, and does it affect the business nemokami skelbimai relation? In addition to the interview, I collected the empirical data from my own experience from living in Switzerland. I also did an interview with Laura, a girl that originally comes from Switzerland but she now lives and works in Lithunia lt.

    As a result, after studying the cultures I would say that there are obvious similarities but also many differences between them. They are both two individualistic cultures where you strive for independence and self- reliant. There is no hierarchy and the organizations are constructed with flat decision-making. We have the same sight on work, relations and career, and the fact that we have similar organization structure is a great advantage when we are making business with each other.

    There are differences as well. The most evident one according to me is the high masculinity index, and the strong uncertainty avoidance in Switzerland. A woman is not seen and treated as we are used to in Lithuania. This might cause a problem in a business situation, because there is a big awareness about men and women’s equality in Lithuania.

    After doing my study, I realized that it is almost impossible to draw conclusions about the differences between two national cultures because they are dynamic and changes all the time. Also when you compare two cultures, you have to generalize on a national level and assume that a whole nation thinks and acts in the same way. It is difficult because it is a fact that people are not handling conflicts and problems in the same way just because they belong to a specific culture. Hofstedes study; Cultural Dimensions was made many years ago and that makes it even more complicated because a lot has happened since then.
    I did compare the national cultures, but one has to keep in mind that my conclusions are generalizations and also a sampling of the total of a culture at one certain moment in time.

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 + 9 =